The January 29, 2025 Elementary and Secondary Education Committee hearing centered on two bills with implications for Missouri students' access to education. House Bill 711, a public school open enrollment proposal sponsored by Representative Paul, dominated discussion with passionate testimony on both sides. This bill—in its fifth year before the legislature—would allow students to attend public schools outside their district of residence through a voluntary system with a 3% transfer cap. Supporters argued it would empower families with educational choices while keeping students in the public system; opponents expressed concerns about potential impacts on smaller districts, transportation inequities, and unintended segregation effects. A key provision regarding students with disabilities was identified for revision. The committee also heard House Bill 538, which would streamline background check processes for transportation companies that partner with schools to transport students, particularly benefiting homeless youth who need assistance reaching their school of origin.
Bills Discussed
HB 538
Surface Score: 4/10
Practical update to an existing program with broad support, but limited controversy or scope.
Summary:
HB 538 allows transportation companies to access Missouri’s fingerprint system for driver background checks, easing the load on school districts partnering with them to transport students.
Noteworthy Points:
26 districts already use these services, especially for homeless or foster kids.
No major opposition, but lawmakers want clearer charter school language.
Could save schools time, with companies needing Highway Patrol approval.
Helps kids get to school in as little as six hours’ notice.
Highly debated with big implications for school choice, funding, and equity; past House success but Senate challenges loom.
Summary:
HB 711 lets students transfer to other public schools if districts opt in, with a 3% cap on exits. State funds follow students; local taxes stay local, aiming to boost parental choice.
Noteworthy Points:
Supporters say it gives parents options and pushes schools to improve.
Opponents fear harm to small districts, segregation, and funding issues.
Lottery system added for fairness, but DESE’s role raises bureaucracy concerns.
Charter school inclusion debated—some push for it, others resist.
Parents handle transport unless kids get aid, sparking equity worries.